{"id":2241,"date":"2013-10-29T12:48:49","date_gmt":"2013-10-29T16:48:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roadtrafficsigns.com\/blog\/?p=2241"},"modified":"2023-11-22T23:57:00","modified_gmt":"2023-11-23T04:57:00","slug":"new-indiana-67-interstate-boondoggle","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roadtrafficsigns.com/blog\/new-indiana-67-interstate-boondoggle\/","title":{"rendered":"New Indiana I-67 interstate: a boondoggle?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Business owners in Indiana and Kentucky are campaigning to build a new interstate, tentatively called the I-67, which would connect with the work-in-progress I-69 near Washington, IN, run south through Jasper and Owensboro, and later link with another highway in Bowling Green, Kentucky.<\/p>\n

\"I-69<\/a>

A stretch of I-69, which would hook up with I-67 near Washington, IN. By Lordsutch<\/a>.<\/p><\/div>\n

The high price tag of highway projects and the low usage of similar highways make it a poor investment, according to critics. The state\u2019s existing interstate, the I-64, is the least-traveled in Indiana, though it connects St. Louis and Louisville. The first segment of the I-69, the most recent highway project, was just completed, and that entire project is estimated to cost $2 to $3 billion by the time it is complete.<\/p>\n

Supporters maintain that the road would provide a boon for area businesses. \u201cIt would become a hub where you have two interstates meeting and with U.S. 50 being the major east-west route crossing 69 its very positive for Daviess County,” Ron Arnold of the Daviess County Economic Development Corporation told local news station WTHITV.<\/p>\n

The proposal has been kicking around for the last few years, and supporters know that they\u2019ll have to wait until I-69 is complete. Yet the coalition of business owners in support of it have already brought their pitch to state government and Washington, D.C. They have also commissioned and presented to the government their own $200,000 study, which found that the new road would host a minimum of 16,000 vehicles a day, and reduce traffic.<\/p>\n

Supporters argue that interstates translate into improved commerce and more jobs. As coalition member Hank Menke explained to the Indiana Economic Digest, \u201cEconomically this is a huge deal. This is a chance to attract industry, maintain our lifestyle and keep our kids at home.\u201d<\/p>\n

Local newspaper, the Evansville Courier Press, had long advocated for the I-69. And the paper is in favor of I-67 as well, editorializing, \u201cThe prospects for area Indiana and Kentucky residents and motorists are exciting, just as they were years ago when talks first began on Interstate 69 and the reality that it was a doable project\u2026 Indeed, it is a worthy mission.\u201d<\/p>\n

Yet critics argue that the expense and the lack of necessity outweigh the coalition members\u2019 fervent support and active lobbying. Even coalition members have admitted that funding may prove a problem, and that they may need to institute tolls. Advocate Menke told local news station WLFI, “We realize right now there is no money to build this road\u2026 We’re going to have to be creative.\u201d The interstate would also cut up sections of the state, particularly in two counties, northern Dubois and souther Daviess, which has implications for residents of those areas.<\/p>\n

Critics hope that there is yet time for the proposal to be squashed. Sums up transportation critic Aaron M. Renn of the infrastructure blog Urbanophile<\/a>, \u201cWhat this actually shows is that for a lot of people, building highways is an end itself. There will never be a day when people aren\u2019t pushing some sort of massive boondoggle.\u201d<\/p>\n

\n

Like this topic? Check out our related products:<\/h3>\n