{"id":2990,"date":"2014-07-28T05:18:14","date_gmt":"2014-07-28T09:18:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.roadtrafficsigns.com\/blog\/?p=2990"},"modified":"2025-02-21T07:20:39","modified_gmt":"2025-02-21T12:20:39","slug":"cellphone-ban-california-effect-accident-rate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.roadtrafficsigns.com/blog\/cellphone-ban-california-effect-accident-rate\/","title":{"rendered":"CA ban on driving while on the phone had no effect on accident rate"},"content":{"rendered":"

Although California banned<\/a> handheld cell phone use in cars in 2008, it doesn’t seem to have had any effect on accidents, according to a recent study.<\/p>\n

University of Colorado, Boulder researchers studied police records of over half a million<\/a> traffic accidents that happened six months before and after the ban.\u00a0The research only looked at six months\u2019 data on each side of the ban to rule out other factors that could have had an effect on the accident rate, like newer, safer cars.<\/p>\n

Accident rate not the same as fatality rate<\/h2>\n

The number of accidents went down<\/a> from 66.7 per day to 65.2 a day across the state, which is, statistically, a minor drop. The study did not look at fatalities<\/a>, which might<\/em> have gone down by a greater degree (we don’t know). Another study<\/a> found that the fatality rate dropped after the ban.<\/p>\n

The University of California, Berkley found a 22% reduction in fatalities two years after the ban came into effect, according to California\u2019s Office of Traffic Safety<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"Handheld<\/a>

Image via Wikimedia Commons<\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

So why didn’t the ban have an impact?<\/h2>\n

People could have shifted from using handheld devices to Bluetooth, according to Daniel Kaffine<\/a>, an author of the study and an associate professor of economics at CU-Boulder.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s possible that people who continued to use their cell phones were people who were more inclined to get into accidents anyway,\u201d he continues. \u201cRiskier drivers might have been the ones who\u00a0said,\u00a0\u2018To hell with it; I\u2019m going to use my phone anyway.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n

People who did not use their cell phones could still have been fiddling with other devices, if they were prone to distracted driving. So, they could still get in accidents.<\/p>\n

Using cell phones while driving vs. driving drunk<\/h2>\n

It\u2019s also possible that past studies, which were done in the lab, overestimated the danger of using cell phones while driving. A 1997 study found that it increased the risk of crashing by four<\/a> times. That\u2019s as dangerous as driving drunk.<\/p>\n

“The idea that it’s as dangerous as drunk driving is not true,” says Kaffine<\/a>. “It’s much harder to get undrunk<\/a>.”<\/p>\n

\n

Like this topic? Check out our related products:<\/h3>\n
<\/div>\n